Risks and Limitations
As with any new technology we introduce into our classrooms, care must be taken to preserve those 
very benefits we provide. We must protect the processes that develop artistic insight such as trial and 
error, personal experimentation, and physical interactions with materials. While AI can be an amazing 
tool for generating new ideas and imagery, we must not allow it to undermine the cultivation of individual 
expression and authentic artistic voice. 
Then there are the inherent concerns regarding ethics and copyright. This becomes a particular 
challenge when we consider the questions regarding originality and intellectual property, especially 
as it applies to our VASE and YAM competitions. It is also important to note that AI tools can produce 
inaccurate or biased information and misleading interpretations. It is the teacher’s role to actively 
encourage verification through multiple sources, whether it relates to personal planning or student 
creative development.
A Guided Use Framework
• Use AI for ideation, not creation…don’t let it be a substitute for hands-on learning.
• Process over product…prioritize reflection, experimentation, and revision.
• Complement AI outputs with other sources of information and research.
• Always question accuracy and bias when using AI tools.
Conclusion
ChatGPT, Google Gemini, and Magic School can be powerful tools that can help to reshape and enhance 
the future of art education. However, their value relies on how we as professionals frame their use to 
support creativity, reflection, and instructional efficiency. By responsibly balancing the inherent benefits 
and risks of emerging technologies, we can use these tools to enhance the creative development our 
students so desperately need.

View this content as a flipbook by clicking here.